Here are just a couple of pictures of the student's final writing projects.
This picture is the "About the Author" page on the back cover of Kerrington's book.
This is a cover from Jasmine's book.
This is a page from Matthew's book.
This is another page from the inside of Jasmine's book.
I cannot even begin to express how proud I am of all the students in my class for the hard work they put into these projects! They truly do amazing work! :)
Technology and Collaboration....the keys to successful 1st grade writers
Thursday, March 20, 2014
Tuesday, March 18, 2014
Wrapping it all up....
What a journey this has been!!! I have loved sharing each step with you all as I have worked through this crazy research study! I will forever be grateful for the comments, suggestions, and encouragement that has been given to me by an amazing group of Godly women! While my final project is not done and my friendships with you all will remain this blog is quickly coming to an end! Other than sharing some final projects with you all (which I will upload pictures of tomorrow) the next big thing I will do is share my presentation with you in our hangout next week.
These are my final steps before I am officially DONE!!!
1. Code for presentation
2. Put presentation together for Google Hangout session
3. FINISH FINAL PAPER!!!!
See you tomorrow with my final post! :)
These are my final steps before I am officially DONE!!!
1. Code for presentation
2. Put presentation together for Google Hangout session
3. FINISH FINAL PAPER!!!!
See you tomorrow with my final post! :)
backtracking...
At different points in the blog I have mentioned what writing pieces the students were working on. This is a simple overview of the pieces I analyzed using the 6+1 rubric.
1. Initial on-demand "expert" book- This book was written independently at the beginning of the informational writing unit. It was written in one 45-minute setting.
2. Animal research book- This was the large writing project that was completed as a partnership. This book took approximately 4 weeks (give or take due to the never ending winter). The students worked in writing workshop for about 30 minutes daily.
3. Post on-demand "expert" book- This book was written independently as the final project of the informational writing unit. It was written in one 45-minute setting.
Here are some pictures of my "coding". The green sticky notes are sentence fluency and the purple are conventions. The pictures do not have the coding for presentation in them.
I am also including some of my narrative about what I found for sentence fluency and conventions in a few of my cases' work.
Elephants
1. Initial on-demand "expert" book- This book was written independently at the beginning of the informational writing unit. It was written in one 45-minute setting.
2. Animal research book- This was the large writing project that was completed as a partnership. This book took approximately 4 weeks (give or take due to the never ending winter). The students worked in writing workshop for about 30 minutes daily.
3. Post on-demand "expert" book- This book was written independently as the final project of the informational writing unit. It was written in one 45-minute setting.
Here are some pictures of my "coding". The green sticky notes are sentence fluency and the purple are conventions. The pictures do not have the coding for presentation in them.
I am also including some of my narrative about what I found for sentence fluency and conventions in a few of my cases' work.
Skunks
Conventions:
Throughout the course of the study Matthew improved
in the area of conventions. On the initial independent on-demand writing prompt
Matthew had several sentences that were missing punctuation. He also had very
large spacing in-between words that was not consistent, and was using a mix of
lowercase and capital letters within words. There are some letters that Matthew
does not form correctly.
As Matthew worked with his partner on his animal
research book his conventions improved considerably. He improved with spacing,
however there are still some large spaces, and he no longer used a mix of
capital and lowercase letters. In his animal book he consistently ended all
sentences with correct punctuation. Matthew continues to form some letters
incorrectly.
Matthew completed a second independent on-demand
writing prompt at the end of this study. On
this
writing prompt Matthew used punctuation at the end of each of his sentences. He
formed his “b” and “d” letters as capitals throughout this piece. I assume the
reason for this was because he did not want to confuse them when writing them
lowercase. On this writing piece Matthew’s spacing is large but is consistent
between each word.
On all three of Matthew’s writing
pieces there were several words that could not easily be decoded. Matthew
confuses some of his letter sounds and this prevents him from being able to
phonetically spell lots of words. After Matthew wrote his on-demand text I had
him reread it to me and I wrote down exactly what he said.
Sentence Fluency:
On the initial on-demand writing
prompt Matthew wrote in a pattern format. He repeated the phrase “I can mac a
…” (I can make a….). The only sentence in his book that broke from this pattern
was the final sentence. Throughout his writing he also used only simple
sentences and used no connective words.
As Matthew wrote his animal research
book with his partner he continued to write only in simple sentences and did
not include connective words to combine sentences and phrases. He began using
different sentence starters and his book did not follow a pattern format. He
did have several sentences in his book that started with “Skunks…” which
resulted in his writing being choppy and repetitive at several different places
in his book.
In Matthew’s post on-demand writing
he carried over the variations of sentence starters. His writing continued to
be simple sentences and there were no transitions or connective words in his
writing. The lack of connective words caused the writing to still sound choppy
and mechanical.
Conventions:
Allison remained inconsistent with
the use of correct conventions throughout the course of this study. In the
beginning Allison completed the independent on-demand writing prompt. On this
writing assignment she wrote one sentence only on most of the pages but was
consistent in using end punctuation. Every sentence began with the word I and
she capitalized it each time. Allison also used some additional capital letters
in the middle of words. Throughout this book most of her words had less than a
finger space between words.
Allison completed the animal
research book with a partner. Throughout her animal research book she was able
to consistently use punctuation correctly in her writing, only missing it on
one page. In her animal research book she continued to be inconsistent. Some words
have one finger space between them but other words have very little to no
spacing between them. Allison did correctly use capital and lowercase letters
throughout this book.
On the final on-demand prompt
Allison worked independently to complete it. In this writing piece she varied
the numbers of sentences she used per page but she used no punctuation to
indicate the beginning or ending of sentences. In this writing piece Allison
used a more consistent spacing between letters but it was a small amount of
space, about the size of a small paperclip.
6+1 Traits of Writing
When I began really examining my students work and looking for big topics/themes that were present in their writing I decided to look specifically at 3 of the 6+1 Traits of Writing. I chose to look at sentence fluency, conventions, and presentation.
Below is the link to the rubric that I used for scoring my pieces.
http://educationnorthwest.org/webfm_send/1434
The three writing pieces that were closely examined throughout this study were all informational text so I felt that these three writing traits were the most fitting.
When looking at the rubric, the students in the study were considered to be in the "Emerging" stage prior to the study beginning. My hope was to see students move toward the "Capable" stage. My research shows how these students worked toward the capable stage both independently and in partner settings. I feel strongly based on my findings that the partner writing with the animal research books significantly helped the students once they had to do their second on-demand independent writing prompt.
Below is the link to the rubric that I used for scoring my pieces.
http://educationnorthwest.org/webfm_send/1434
The three writing pieces that were closely examined throughout this study were all informational text so I felt that these three writing traits were the most fitting.
When looking at the rubric, the students in the study were considered to be in the "Emerging" stage prior to the study beginning. My hope was to see students move toward the "Capable" stage. My research shows how these students worked toward the capable stage both independently and in partner settings. I feel strongly based on my findings that the partner writing with the animal research books significantly helped the students once they had to do their second on-demand independent writing prompt.
Thursday, March 13, 2014
Wrapping it up
Okay.....so I am not really wrapping it up but we are definitely on the downhill slope of research.
Here is a breakdown of what I still need from students:
-1 student must finish their animal book. She is working on her pictures so it is only her "presentation" component that is lacking.
- students will complete the on-demand writing prompt (writing an expert book) tomorrow
-students will complete the writing attitude inventory
Hopefully I will get my narratives done for their animal books this weekend and will be able to begin comparing their pre- and post- on-demand writing prompts. These will be scored looking at the conventions, presentation, and organization components of the 6+1 writing rubrics.
Fingers crossed that this weekend is super productive!
Here is a breakdown of what I still need from students:
-1 student must finish their animal book. She is working on her pictures so it is only her "presentation" component that is lacking.
- students will complete the on-demand writing prompt (writing an expert book) tomorrow
-students will complete the writing attitude inventory
Hopefully I will get my narratives done for their animal books this weekend and will be able to begin comparing their pre- and post- on-demand writing prompts. These will be scored looking at the conventions, presentation, and organization components of the 6+1 writing rubrics.
Fingers crossed that this weekend is super productive!
the light at the end of the tunnel
The title of this unfortunately doesn't mean I see the light at the end of the tunnel of this project but it does mean that I saw the light at the end of the tunnel for the MEGA writing project that my kids have been working on. I feel like I can really dive into looking at their writing pieces this weekend and getting an overall picture of each "case" based on this writing piece, as well as, their pre- and post- on-demand writing prompts. I am SO excited and proud of how the students did on their animal research books but let me tell you I am so glad to have that projects in the books for this school year and to not have to revisit it again for a year. It is such an undertaking but every year the kids really blow me away with what they produce.
I have decided by looking at the way that they wrote their books that I will be looking at each student as their own case. My final paper will be written like a case study. Since the students were all kind of working in isolated scenarios it fit best to look at them this way. That being said I have 9 different "cases". That seems to be a lot but I think it will be really good once I am examining it all.
I have picked three "organizing topics" that I will be writing up narratives about for each case. These three topics are conventions, presentation, and idea development. I plan to work on the conventions section heavily and will try and write up a blog posting some of my narratives for a couple of the cases on my blog tonight. I pulled these three topics from 6+1 traits. These seem to be specific traits that apply largely to informational writing which has been the focus of my entire study with my students.
Hope everyone is doing well!!!!
I have decided by looking at the way that they wrote their books that I will be looking at each student as their own case. My final paper will be written like a case study. Since the students were all kind of working in isolated scenarios it fit best to look at them this way. That being said I have 9 different "cases". That seems to be a lot but I think it will be really good once I am examining it all.
I have picked three "organizing topics" that I will be writing up narratives about for each case. These three topics are conventions, presentation, and idea development. I plan to work on the conventions section heavily and will try and write up a blog posting some of my narratives for a couple of the cases on my blog tonight. I pulled these three topics from 6+1 traits. These seem to be specific traits that apply largely to informational writing which has been the focus of my entire study with my students.
Hope everyone is doing well!!!!
Thursday, March 6, 2014
Post meeting
I met with Dr. BC and walked away feeling EXTREMELY overwhelmed with what to do. I decided to take only a small bit of my students writing and code it for activity 4. I plan to really dive in this weekend and do a lot more coding. I will update more about my research this weekend as it comes along.
As Dr. BC and I talked we began really talking about the "research design" and the participants in my study. I am really looking for a word to replace "struggling" in my RQ. I don't want to talk about these kids using the word struggling. What do you all think about emergent?
One thing I didn't see coming through my meeting with Dr. BC was the decision to throw the student "Parker" out. He was the one student who truly fit the "reluctant" characteristic but we discussed that he is not struggling/emergent/pre-writer/etc so we decided to throw him. He seemed like the perfect for into my project and I ended up learning great ways to push him to being a better writer but he just didn't fit my profile.
Crazy how this is such an ongoing process! What a different world this is than anything else we have ever done!
As Dr. BC and I talked we began really talking about the "research design" and the participants in my study. I am really looking for a word to replace "struggling" in my RQ. I don't want to talk about these kids using the word struggling. What do you all think about emergent?
One thing I didn't see coming through my meeting with Dr. BC was the decision to throw the student "Parker" out. He was the one student who truly fit the "reluctant" characteristic but we discussed that he is not struggling/emergent/pre-writer/etc so we decided to throw him. He seemed like the perfect for into my project and I ended up learning great ways to push him to being a better writer but he just didn't fit my profile.
Crazy how this is such an ongoing process! What a different world this is than anything else we have ever done!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)